technology 6 min read

Apple's Foldable iPhone Enters a Market Samsung Has Held for Years

Apple's long-awaited foldable iPhone arrives as a super-premium device priced above $2,000, entering a market where Samsung already commands 38% share and Chinese rivals have already launched competing form factors. The real question is whether late entry matters when you're Apple.

  • Samsung
  • Apple
  • Foldable Phones
  • Smartphone Industry

Apple’s Foldable iPhone Arrives Late — But the Clock Ticks Differently Now

Apple is about to do something it has spent seven years postponing. On the morning of September 10 (Korea time), under the banner of an event called “Surprise and Shine,” the company will unveil what is almost certainly its first foldable iPhone. The name has not been officially confirmed, but the industry is already calling it iPhone Ultra, iPhone Fold, or iPhone Duo. It will arrive as a left-opening book-style device, folding from roughly 5.4 inches to about 7.8 inches, built on TSMC’s 2-nanometer A20 Pro chip, and priced above $2,000.

What makes this moment more interesting than a simple product launch is the context surrounding it. This is the first major hardware event led by John Turner, Apple’s new CEO who took over after Tim Cook’s departure earlier this year. Turner is a hardware engineering executive, not a marketing figurehead. That the first act of his tenure is unveiling Apple’s most risky hardware experiment in years signals that this is not a token move — it is a strategic commitment.

And it comes late to a party that has already set the table.

Samsung’s Hinge Advantage Is Real — And It Bought Time Apple Just Burned

Samsung has been shipping foldable phones since 2019. Its Galaxy Z Fold series is now on its eighth generation. The company has accumulated years of hinge engineering, panel durability data, and supply chain relationships that cannot be shortcut. Every generation has shaved millimeters off the crease depth, improved the hinge mechanism, and pushed the thinness envelope. This is not theoretical — it is measured in consumer repair rates and return statistics that Samsung has quietly optimized over half a decade.

Apple enters this market knowing exactly what those numbers look like. Counterpoint Research projects that global foldable phone cumulative shipments will exceed 100 million units this year. Samsung is expected to hold 38% of that market. Apple, in its debut year, is forecast to capture roughly 25%. That is a strong opening for a newcomer, but it is not domination. Samsung still leads.

What Apple does have is brand gravity. The foldable category has long suffered from a perception problem: it is innovative but expensive, fragile-feeling, and niche. Apple does not need to win the category by volume. It needs to convince the people who already buy iPhones that a foldable is worth the premium — and that the fold itself is something they can trust.

The Price Signal: $2,000 Is Not a Mistake

The pricing is deliberate. Apple is positioning the foldable iPhone as a super-premium device, sitting above even the current iPhone Pro Max. If early supply reports from Nikkei Asia are accurate — production running at only a few hundred units per day — then Apple is deliberately constraining availability to protect the exclusivity narrative. This is the same playbook the company used with the original Apple Watch and the Vision Pro: scarcity as strategy.

But there is a practical dimension too. Limited initial supply is a hedge against yield issues. Foldable OLED panels remain one of the hardest display formats to manufacture at scale. Samsung Display dominates the supply chain for these panels, which creates a dependency Apple must navigate carefully. The hinge, the flexible circuitry, the thin glass — each adds complexity that ripples through production. Fewer units at launch means fewer early-adopter complaints, fewer return rates, and more time to solve manufacturing problems before the next cycle.

That the company is reportedly considering Touch ID in the power button rather than Face ID for this device is telling. It suggests Apple is willing to trade a signature feature for form factor constraints. Whether consumers will accept that trade-off is an open question. Face ID has been a core differentiator for years. Removing it from the top-tier foldable could feel like a concession — or a bold recalibration of what matters.

The Chinese Threat Is Real and Moving Fast

While Apple was polishing its hinge design, competitors did not stand still. Huawei launched the Mate XT2 on September 7 — a triple-fold device that opens to reveal three panels in a row. Xiaomi unveiled the Xiaomi 18 Fold, a book-style competitor. Samsung has the Galaxy Z Fold8 on deck. Apple is not just entering a market; it is arriving in the middle of one.

This is the crucial thing English-language coverage often misses about the Asian foldable race. The pace of iteration in China is relentless. Huawei and Xiaomi are pushing form factors that Apple is not yet attempting — tri-folds, rollables, dual-hinge designs. Samsung is iterating on the same book format but with more generations of refinement. Apple is bringing the first foldable with a completely new approach to the crease problem and the panel hinge architecture, but it has no multi-fold experience to draw on.

The risk is that by the time Apple scales production, the category’s definition has already broadened beyond what the iPhone Ultra represents. If the next wave of consumer interest shifts toward tri-folds or other experimental form factors, Apple’s first attempt could look conservatively dated before it hits stores.

The Fall Release Strategy Shift Is the Bigger Story

Perhaps more significant than the foldable itself is what the event reveals about Apple’s product cadence. The standard iPhone 18 is expected to be absent. Instead, the fall lineup will focus on Pro models, the Pro Max, and the foldable. The base iPhone 18, the iPhone 18e, and the second-generation iPhone Air are rumored for a spring launch next year.

If true, this is the first time Apple has split its iPhone releases across two seasons. It represents a fundamental change in a rhythm that has defined the company’s calendar for nearly two decades. The rationale is clear: the foldable needs space in the lineup, and Apple wants to avoid cannibalizing its own high-end products. But it also means iPhone buyers will adjust to a new expectation — that the most interesting Apple phones may not all arrive at the same time.

What Happens Next Depends on Execution, Not Launch Day

The foldable iPhone will sell. Apple has built a consumer base that buys into its ecosystem regardless of whether a feature is first-mover. The real test is whether this device can sustain momentum past the initial wave of enthusiasts and adopters. Foldable phones have a reputation for disappointing after the novelty fades — brittle hinges, bright creases, software that has not been optimized for the larger unfolded screen.

Apple’s advantage here is software. iOS has historically been more disciplined about adapting to new form factors than Android has. The company can enforce app behavior across the unfolded and folded states in a way that fragmentary Android ecosystems cannot. If the foldable iPhone delivers a seamless transition between forms — and if the software feels as polished as the hardware — it could accelerate foldable adoption among users who have been waiting for permission to make the switch.

The numbers matter less than the narrative. Apple does not need to overtake Samsung in foldable volume this year. It needs to make the category feel inevitable. If the iPhone Ultra achieves that, the $2,000 price tag becomes a feature, not a flaw. If it stumbles, Apple’s reputation for product completeness takes a hit it has avoided for decades.

Turner’s first act sets the tone. The market is watching.